Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Business Problem: Hiring In A Tight Labor Market
The basis for hiring high performers is found in an organization's ability to keep them. If a business can create an environment that is stimulating, rewarding, positive and even fun, good employees are less tempted to leave. Most bright people are astute enough to understand that the grass really isn't always greener elsewhere.
Here are a few thoughts on hiring in a tight labor market:
-As mentioned, the fewer high performers you lose translates into a less urgent need to hire more except in the case of accelerated business growth. Refer to Business Problem: High Employee Turnover to learn more about reducing employee turnover in your organization. A significant issue as it relates to hiring people in any type of labor market is the reputation your organization has as an employer. Word about the kind of company they work for travels quickly from current employees to outsiders. It doesn't take long for a company's reputation to become tarnished by current and former employees who are disgruntled about the way they are/were treated. When a company has a very solid reputation as an employer and it is known as an organization that cares about its employees, prospective employees will be more proactive in seeking employment there. When an organization has a bad reputation as an employer, the chances of hiring and/or retaining high performers are slim. This issue is very often overlooked as a reason why a company can't seem to attract good employees.
-Look at who's in charge of your hiring efforts. If you have a Human Resources department, do those involved in hiring understand the process? Are they aggressive in identifying strong candidates? If managers or supervisors are responsible for finding people, are they skilled in promoting the organization to prospective employees? Are they taking enough time to do justice to the hiring process? Is there laziness in the hiring process?
-Placing ads in newspapers can be a futile effort in a tight labor market. The likelihood of attracting more than a few potential high performers is not good. And the likelihood of hiring one of them can be even more remote. If you are going to place ads, place them in newpapers or magazines that provide some chance of attracting quailified candidates. The most important thing in placing ads is to be as specific as possible about the requirements for the job. If you are unclear about the specific requirements, you run the risk of attracting fewer qualified candidates and a host of unqualified candidates. Spend a little extra money to buy a larger ad in order to have enough space to promote your organization and to furnish the specific position requirements.
-Be aggressive and creative. Most organizations lament their inability to attract good candidates, but they are strictly using traditional methods such as newspaper ads to find them. Using your contacts, put out the word to as many people as possible that you are looking for a particular type of individual. Don't be afraid to ask them if they know anyone matching what you are looking for. Ask aquaintances and friends if they had former employees who were excellent employees matching your requirements. If they have someone in mind, find out where they are now and don't be afraid to contact them either by phone, mail or email. Attend as many business functions as possible. Remember that you are always on the lookout for prospective employees even when you don't have an immediate need. When you meet someone who seems to possess the qualities and background you deem important in your employees keep their business card and make a note on the back of it about your impressions of the individual. Keep these cards in a separate location specifically for prospective candidates. When you are shopping, make note of employees such as receptionists or sales clerks who seem to have the skills you are looking for. Don't be afraid to plant a seed about future employment. The point here is that you need to keep your eyes open constantly for prospective employees. We all run into them every day, but fail to make the connection that they could well be working for us.
-Use head hunting and search firms carefully. Many are nothing more than resume handlers and don't carefully screen candidates for "fit" to your jobs. There are some, however, that do a good job of matching candidates to employers and positions. Ask your friends and aquaintances if they have used search firms. If so who do they recommend you use and who should you stay away from. Keep in mind that you will pay a healthy fee when using a search firm. If you are using a firm for the first time, negotiate a lower first time trial use fee and let the firm know if they do a good job you will use them again.
Identifying and hiring qualified high performing employees is one of the most difficult tasks of the business world. Employers simply have to be aggressive in their efforts to locate good people. Look at your current hiring practices and modify them to become more efficient and more aggressive in locating good candidates. But, be selective in who you hire. Even in a tight labor market you are better off leaving a position open than filling it with a marginal employee.
Monday, February 25, 2008
Sometimes It Pays To Spend A Little More
Friday, February 22, 2008
Don't Assume Good Times Will Last Forever
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Value Your Reputation
How you deal with vendors, employees and customers all factor in to the reputation you develop. And all three of these constituent groups are critical to the success of any business. Too many companies don't understand the importance of developing and maintaining a solid reputation as a company that can be trusted, relied upon and that treats people fairly. The basic philosophy and culture of the organization will fuel the perceptions of employees, customers and vendors as well as the public at large.
We believe strongly that organizations have to manage their reputations. They do so from the top. Owners and top management must buy into a philosophy that has at its center honesty, fairness, responsiveness and consistency in how the organization deals with internal and external constituent groups.
Top management should strive to communicate clearly to all employees that they expect them to treat each other, vendors, customers and the public they come in contact with while representing the company in a manner that is consistent with the philosophy described above. When employees deviate from that philosophy, it is important to clarify for them those expectations and reinforce the fact that behaving in a manner inconsistent with the organization's philosophies is not an option. For employees who just can't buy into those philosophies, they will be better off finding an organization that better fits their own values and perspectives.
Since each employee has the opportunity to impact the reputation of the organization, all should receive appropriate training in dealing with people in routine and in potential conflict situations. When the reputation of an organization becomes too tarnished, it is either impossible or it takes a long period of time to shift negative perceptions that have been created.
The way an organization conducts business is critical to its long-term success. People want to do business with companies they feel good about. If there is any doubt in their minds, they are less likely to take a chance. Take time to assess what kind of reputation your organization has. Ask employees, customers, vendors and the general public what they think of your company. Use that input to improve upon your approach to doing business.
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Are Your Goals Really Goals?
Goals should be a part of a formalized, written strategic plan. The strategic plan is your road map...the strategic planning process determines what you market, where you market it, how you market it, and, more simply, how you are going to allocate precious money and people resources.
Goals should have the following characteristics:
-They are attainable.
-They require hard work to achieve.
-They are easily understood.
-They reflect critical aspects of the organization.
-They support the overall mission or purpose of the organization.
-They are consistent with the organization's capabilities and resources.
Goals are the jumping off point, so to speak, for developing specific objectives, strategies and tactics. The combination of goals, objectives, strategies and tactics form the strategic plan.
Your people should be well aware of and focused on the organization's goals. Without this focus, your people are never sure where the company is headed and, therefore, cannot fully embrace the importance of the various decisions being made.
Ask yourself and your employees these questions when you sense that impending decisions might be drifting away from the direction provided by your goals; What are our goals? Does this decision help us achieve one or more of those goals?
Make sure that your goals are not really strategies in disguise. This example illustrates the difference between goals, objectives and strategies for a company looking to grow through diversification:
Goal: Achieve profitable diversification of the company.
Objective: Have in place one new division by 12/31/99.
Strategy: Diversify through acquisition as opposed to product development.
This example clearly shows one of the key areas of focus for the company; diversification. And it shows how they intend to achieve this goal; by acquiring another company. This goal and its supporting objective(s) and strategy(s) clearly communicates to interested parties that at least part of the company's growth will come through diversification by acquisition.
Look at your comany's goals. Are they clear, concise and meaningful? Do they provide real focus? If you achieve each of your goals, will your company be successful or more successful than it is today? Do your people know what the goals are and are the goals ingrained into the culture? Have you limited the number of goals to somewhere between 3 and 7 since too many goals will confuse and muddy the focus and too few might not provide enough focus.
If your company doesn't have a sound strategic plan in place, you are living dangerously. Without one your organization is like a rudderless ship. Today's business climate is much too competitive to not have a well constructed strategic plan.
Successful, high performing companies, large and small, have a long-range plan and they live it and breath it. Their focus is on that plan and on their goals.
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Lost Customers and Profitability
Monday, February 18, 2008
Show Your Employees That You Care
Saturday, February 16, 2008
The Struggle Between Efficiency and Effectiveness
But with all this talk about efficiency, are we losing something in terms of being effective? To distinguish between effectiveness and efficiency, a brief definition should help. Effectiveness is doing the right thing. Efficiency is doing things right. These simple definitions point to a clear distinction that has major implications for businesses of all sizes. The implications arise from the difficulty in balancing both efficiency and effectiveness.
With the pressure to constantly be as efficient as possible, an organization can get caught up in focusing too much on reducing process time and/or the number of employees and not enough on what makes sense for the organization. For example, suppose a distribution company decides that it is taking too long to process orders because there is an additional review step in place to ensure that the order is accurate. But often times, orders get backed up slightly for shipping because the people doing the additional accuracy check on outgoing orders fall behind. So the decision is made to eliminate this additional step and at the same time save some money by eliminating two positions. This is done in the name of efficiency because orders will go out faster which has some real merit. But the result of eliminating this additional step is a significant increase in incorrect orders being shipped. The impact of this is additional time dealing with more customer complaints, additional picking and restocking time, additional costs of returned shipments and, above all, customer ill will.
This example illustrates how doing the right thing is often overshadowed by doing things right. What employees often view as being efficient can many times impact the company negatively. This is why it is important for management to create an environment where employees are encouraged to look for ways to become more efficient, but do so without degrading the level of customer service and quality.
Bringing a balance between efficiency and effectiveness is one of the critical jobs of any owner or manager. In the above example, the company might have been realizing a competitive advantage because it was shipping orders with a higher degree of accuracy than its competitors. When it decided to save some money by streamlining a process and eliminating some positions, it lost that competitive advantage. And in terms of saving money, any savings realized from the streamlining were in all likelihood given back several times over.
It is important for businesses to constantly look for ways to do things right....to become more efficient. But it is equally important that decisions along those lines be made by asking questions about the impact on quality, customer service and employee morale. Bad decisions relative to efficiency can very often have a negative effect on all three of these variables.
With regard to technology and efficiency, does the addition of new technology to any process have a positive impact on these variables? Business processes and what's good for the customer should drive the implementation of technology. Technology should not dictate how a process gets defined. Start with the customer and work backwards. Define the process based on the best way to serve the customer and the best way to accomplish tasks. Once the business process is defined, match the technology to the process. When technology is allowed to drive the business, things tend to get forced to fit and the customer, productivity and employee morale with often suffer.
We can safely say that balancing efficiency and effectiveness is not easy. But it is important for organizations to stay focused on the long-term impact of all decisions. Yes, short-term performance is important, but if it takes precedence over long-term viability it could lead to a decline in performance over time.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
How Does Your Company Do Performance Evaluations?
At the top of the blog there is a poll to let us know how your company does performance evaluations. Simply click on how your company does performance evaluations or if you don't see how your company performs them, please feel free to leave a comment.
Customer Retention
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
MyBusinessBooks Performance Review Manual


Monday, February 11, 2008
Think Before You Grow
If a business is fundamentally sound and well managed, the opportunity for growth outside of its core business is better than if there are significant problems. Companies often attempt to grow by diversifying into marginally related or unrelated businesses and then end up divesting themselves of those business units after a short period of time. But why? It can be for a variety of reasons, but most often the reason stems from simply not understanding the new line of business. What made the company successful in its core business was probably a good understanding of the products or services, the market(s), the competition and the nuances of the industry. Transferring that knowledge into a marginally related or unrelated business is not very often an advantage. In fact, it can be a decided disadvantage because the tendency is to do business a lot like it has always been done. In the new business unit, it's likely that things are accomplished in a different manner.
And the mere fact that resources are being drawn toward the new business and away from the core business can have a negative impact on the core business unit. This is particularly true if management personnel are expected to divide their attention among several different businesses. The focus and discipline that is so important to being successful in a single business is compromised by adding the new line of business.
The other scenario that we often witness is the company that is poorly managed or that has some other significant fundamental problem(s), but tries to grow its way out of trouble either through diversification or through expansion of its existing business. In this scenario the business is already struggling to some extent due to poor fundamental management. Then the company adds fuel to the fire by stretching resources beyond their capacity and capability. If a management team is struggling with managing the existing business in its current state, why would management or ownership want to take on more? Unless the company is a dinosaur operating in a dinosaur industry, this is an excellent question.
What makes more sense is to closely analyze what the company does well and what it does poorly. Then address those things the company does poorly and develop a plan for strengthening them. Until the core business unit works through the fundamental management issues, it rarely makes any sense to try to grow either through expansion of the existing business or especially through diversification.
Before making a conscious effort to expand, ask yourself if you and the rest of the company are ready for it. Be objective and take your ego out of the assessment. Your ego will tend to drive you to wanting to expand so it is important to be honest with yourself about the motives for wanting to take on any sort of expansion. Once ego is neutralized, inventory those problem areas and prioritize them in terms of what needs to be addressed first. Then develop a plan for attacking each of the issues or problem areas and start the plan in motion. Until the fundamental problems are corrected, think twice about expanding or diversifying.
Friday, February 8, 2008
Stay In Touch With Customers
In the early stages of building a business, the owner is heavily involved with selling and/or customer service and, therefore, in constant contact with customers. The owner has a good feel for what they want and their reactions to and perceptions of how you conduct business. As the business grows, the owner becomes less involved with hands-on operations and sales and loses the pulse of the market and the customer. It is important for top management to stay very much in touch with customers. Finding the time can be difficult, but it might be one of the single most important activities an owner or manager can partake in.
One way of remaining close to the customer is to schedule specific times to ride with sales people, spend time on the retail floor or take calls in customer service. While it might sound like unproductive time, the amount of valuable information that can be obtained can be significant and, in some cases, critical to the success of the business.
A key is to be disciplined about staying involved with the customer. Avoid jumping in and doing it and then forgetting about it. Customers should also feel like they can talk directly to someone in top management. An open door policy for customers is an invitation for customers to let their feelings be known and for you to fix whatever problem they need fixed.
Being a customer-driven company means staying in close touch with customers. Too many owners and managers become almost arrogant about not wanting to deal directly with customers. Their attitude reflects their lack of understanding about how high performance companies achieve that status.
Start today with a customer contact program that puts you and other top management personnel in consistent and constant touch with your customer base. Develop a specific plan for getting these people out of their offices and into customer locations, on a phone with customers or on a retail floor interacting and dealing with customers.
Thursday, February 7, 2008
Keep It Simple
But something happens in many businesses along the path to success (or failure). The people responsible for running the business begin to make their lives and others' lives difficult by adding levels of complexity that often don't need to exist. Most of this is a result of poor planning and implementation and a lack of adequate management skills.
In every facet of a business, it is wise to constantly think in terms of how things can be kept simple. Processes should be as simple as possible. When processes become unduly complex, communication breaks down, mistakes occur and customer service suffers. Communication should be kept very simple as well. The more words that are used in communicating, the greater the chance of miscommunicating. It is important to provide enough details to clearly communicate what it is you want to get across, but do so in a concise, straightforward manner.
When dealing with problems whether they are operational in nature or related to employees, avoid the tendency to make more out of the problem than is really there. In other words, stay away from making things appear worse than they are. Taking a "sky is falling" approach to problems simply encourages havoc and chaos that often clouds the ability to resolve the problem. It is important to stay calm, think rationally and positively and to remain optimistic. Work through the issues methodically and work toward a solution. Effective managers are adept at keeping their emotions in check and not allowing negativity to creep into their thinking.
Using common sense in resolving business issues is critical. Most business issues and challenges can be dealt with by using simple common sense and keeping things in the proper perspective. Managers who possess a high level of common sense tend to be more successful because they apply sound reasoning and logic to getting things done. Those who try to apply a lot of theory to getting things done often find it difficult to move beyond the theory and into practice. In other words they tend to get caught up in deriving complex models for getting things done when a relatively simple approach would suffice.
We often refer to blocking and tackling when it comes to business success. Blocking and tackling represents the fundamental business practices that must be in place to be successful. We also break businesses down into four fundamentally simple, but broad categories:
1) people
2) strategy
3) processes
4) culture
We believe that managers must deal with these four variables effectively to create a successful business and create value in the business. This approach also allows businesses to focus on four relatively straightforward areas and encourages simplicity in planning and management. Knowing that these four variables must be affected to be successful is a big first step in getting to a simple, logical approach to managing a business. Why? Because it brings focus to what needs to be dealt with.
Sure there are a number of sub-variables within each of these broader categories, but most businesses fail to compartmentalize their businesses in a way that makes sense. Management should look at these four variables and begin by asking these simple questions:
1) do we have the right people in the right jobs?
2) do we have the right strategies defined?
3) are our processes as simple and efficient as possible?
4) do we have a high morale, customer-driven culture?
In most organizations, the answer will be "no" to one or more of these questions if management is willing to be honest and objective in assessing the situation. A "no" answer is a call to action. A simple, but well defined plan of attack needs to be assembled to deal with deficiencies that might exist.
Maintaining simplicity in business whenever possible is important. Is your approach logical and based on common sense? Are your daily processes and procedures simple and efficient? If not, take a look at how you might simplify your business and, therefore, your life.
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
Beware Of The Culture
A small minority of organizations take on a high accountability, high performance profile. This becomes the culture that employees become accustomed to and strive to meet expectations built around this culture. The vast majority of organizations, however, develop cultures that fall short of high accountability, high performance. They range from very low accountability and performance to just short of high accountability and performance.
The culture is a result of management and people. Over time, "behavior" becomes so deeply rooted that it becomes very difficult to change. New leadership/management is sometimes brought in to turn the business around and change the culture. But this can often be troublesome for the new manager or leader.
Because a culture is so interweaved in the daily acitivities and behavior of the organization, it takes time to change it. It is most difficult to shift a low accountability culture to a high accountability culture. Employees in a low accounability culture are often marginal in terms of their ability to perform at a high level. When a manager suddenly makes a shift toward higher performance expectations, these employees often fight back in subtle and not so subtle ways. Even the best managers in these situations can sometimes fail.
A culture can fight change in such a way that the old guard becomes convinced that any planned change is bad and will have no part of it. Change in a low performance/low accountability culture is a threat because the employees fear being able to execute the plan and they fear being held accountable for high performance......something they might not be able to achieve.
To avoid a culture backlash, move slowly in making changes. Get a good feel for the type of employees and what they will fear most. Try to minimize those fears through strong communication and a commitment to helping them become better employees. Assure employees that any change will be accompanied by necessary training and patience in moving to a higher level of performance and accountability.
But bear in mind that even by moving slowly and trying to put employees at ease, there can still be significant resistance. Remember that most of the employees in a low accountability/low performance culture are comfortable with that culture and would rather leave it that way.....even though sustained low performance can lead to business failure.
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Watch Those Shifting Priorities
An all too common problem in businesses with (and without) sound plans in place is a constant shifting of priorities based on ill-conceived reasons for making the shifts. Often times the shifts occur because the owner or manager can't maintain focus and discipline in carrying out a plan. Or, as is more often the case there is not a good plan in place and any sort of focus is next to impossible to achieve. Sometimes the personality of the owner or manager is such that decisions are based far too much on emotion or impulse and those decisions can contradict a decision that might have been made only hours or days earlier.
When priorities and direction shift for no apparent reason other than the whim of the owner or manager, employees become very frustrated. They find themselves working hard to achieve one objective one day and perhaps an entirely different one the next. Or they sense there is indecision on the part of management and they lose confidence in management's ability to lead the company effectively.
To avoid shifting priorities, make sure that you have a well developed and sound strategic plan and a well conceived operating/business plan in place. Stay focused on the goals set forth in your strategic plan. Goals should change only when there is compelling evidence that your direction is inappropriate. If the plan is well conceived to begin with, this will rarely be the case. If you tend to be an anxious person, make sure your stress doesn't interfere with good judgement. Just because you have a setback or two doesn't mean that a shift in your priorities in needed. Every business encounters setbacks of some sort. Expect them and deal with them. But don't change your focus unless you know that you are headed in the wrong direction (remember that it's just as damaging to stick with a bad decision/strategy).
Monday, February 4, 2008
Business Problem: Difficulty Closing Sales
-The quality or perceived quality of the product or service in question.
-Price.
-The strength of the relationship between the sales rep or other key company representative involved in the process and the customer.
-The quality of the sales presentation(s).
-The strength of competition.
-The reputation of the company.
-The diligence and timeliness of the sales rep or other key company representative in responding to the customer's questions, concerns and issues.
-Past buying experience(s) with the company.
While there are probably other factors that enter into the decision of the customer, we believe the factors identified above are the most critical. Most organizations think that price is the single most important factor in closing sales. However, price is most often a factor when there is little differentiation in the other factors identified above. Otherwise, it is not generally the primary reason for purchasing from one supplier over another.
But, concentrating on keeping costs down to support as low a price as possible is certainly not a bad idea. It is always a good idea to control product/service input costs without sacrificing quality to allow flexibility in pricing while maintaining reasonable gross profit levels. This is certainly an area that many organizations need to work on. Obviously, most customers will not pay an unreasonable premium even when a strong relationship exists.
Beyond price it is extraordinarily important for businesses to focus on developing as strong a relationship as possible with their customers. A relationship is built in a number of ways. Previous buying experiences help the customer evaluate courtesy and quality of staff, follow up, responsiveness to questions and problems, product/service quality and overall level of customer service.
In the absence of previous buying experience there is little for the customer to go on in terms of evaluating the company. Therefore, it is imperative that sales reps and others involved in the selling and relationship development process do an excellent job of contacting the customer, establishing an initial relationship, developing that relationship throughout the selling process and beyond and following up diligently and carefully to questions and concerns of the customer. Sales reps that have a "quick strike" mentality are those that believe that relationship development is secondary to getting the sale. In fact, if reps would view the process differently and focus first on the relationship and second on the sale, the closing rate will almost always go up.
Here are some tips for closing sales at a higher rate:
-Set clear, demanding and reasonable expectations for sales reps about making sales calls and territory coverage. See Expect Your Sales Force To Make The Calls for more information.
Hire relationship-oriented sales people with strong customer service skills.
-Train sales reps carefully in presentation skills. Making poor presentations can hurt closing rates due to lack of clarity and the fact that a negative perception is created. Train reps in handling objections. Sales reps sometimes handle objections in objectionable ways such as putting down competitors. Teach your reps to focus on what your company can do for the customer and how it will benefit them.
-Be persistent without being a pest. Don't leave the customer wondering if you are interested in his/her business by leaving long intervals between contacts. By the same token, don't make contact so often that is becomes annoying.
-Be honest. Don't lie to customers or make things up. If you don't know an answer, don't offer one. Tell the customer you will get an answer and get back to them quickly. Then do it. Don't leave the customer in the dark!
-Make certain that the proposal or sales material is well written, clear and concise and provides enough detail for the customer to evaluate your offer.
-Ask for the business! Making a presentation and following up on a customer's questions will generally only get you so far. Don't be shy. Ask for the sale in a way that shows you care about the customer and value his/her business. Don't be overly aggressive, but don't be reluctant to go for the gold, so to speak.
-After the sale, follow up to ensure a high quality of service. Work on strengthening the relationship and assist in dealing with any after-sale problems that arise.
-Clearly, closing a sale is a process. It is rarely a matter of making a single call and getting the order. It requires diligence, patience, professionalism and tenacity.
Friday, February 1, 2008
Common Attributes of a Good Manager
We routinely study managers and supervisors seeking answers as to why certain managers are successful and others seem to fail. It is somewhat difficult to find a truly good manager. But it really is not all that difficult to identify the attributes that separate good managers from average or bad ones.
Contrary to what many believe, a significant problem in any business is a lack of qualified management personnel. Bear in mind that people are the key factor in the success of any business. And it all starts with the management team. There seems to be such a dearth of good managers that organizations tend to accept mediocrity as a way of life rather than deal with the difficult issues of turning bad managers out. Or their managers are not good mentors and coaches and haven't worked to mold them into effective managers. It really seems to be a vicious cycle in most businesses.
But when it is time to identify someone for a management position, it helps immensely to look for certain attributes that tend to be found in good managers. The following list is probably not a complete one, but it seems to form a good foundation in terms of identifying what attributes are common among good managers:
-They have strong people skills.
-They possess strong communication skills, both verbal and written.
-They have a sense of fairness in dealing with people and issues.
-They exhibit consistency in behavior.
-They are able to control emotions and keep them out of decision making and interactions with -others.
-They believe that employees are more important to his/her and the company's success than he/she is.
-They are honest.
-They are willing to seek input from employees and build consensus.
-They are open minded.
-They are flexible.
-They have well controlled egos.
-They are self-confident.
-They are good listeners.
-They possess the ability to be direct when needed without being abusive or offensive.
-They have a sincere interest in people and their well being.
-They have good perceptive/intuitive abilities.
-They possess a good understanding of what makes people tick.
-They are mature.
-They allow others to get credit for positive outcomes.
-They understand that hiring good people is critical to their success and they do not micromanage.
-They are willing to admit to their own shortcomings and mistakes and do not feel a persistent need to be right.
How do you and other managers/supervisors working in your organization stack up against each of these attributes? Using a five point scale with 1 being little of a particular attribute and 5 being a lot, rate yourself against this list. If you feel comfortable doing so, have others do the same and compare your perception of the attributes you bring to the workplace to the perceptions of co-workers and subordinates.
Keep in mind that all of us bring certain personality traits and associated behaviors to the workplace. Probably the two keys to becoming an excellent manager are; 1) being self aware and 2) understanding that changes in behavior are likely necessary. Those who can achieve self awareness and appropriate behavioral modifications that coincide with the list above will typically achieve the highest levels of success as managers.
The award winning Managing People For High Performance self-study training manual provides additional in-depth information regarding management and supervisory attributes and skills. Also included in this widely used workbook is a personality assessment tool that will allow you to better compare your personality and behaviors to the attributes most desirable in managers. Visit our sister site mybusinessbooks.com to order your copy today.
